great-lounge Wednesday 29 June 2022

112 messages10 people

  1. FoundationGames

    i'd like to point out that 1.19.1 which was meant to release on the 28th is not released
  2. CDAGamingTeam

    Yea, its way past the release window to be able to release today
  3. FoundationGames

    it's literally the 29th in stockholm if i remember correctly
  4. CDAGamingTeam

    this as well. For the record, I did not approve nor was made aware of @Azzyypaaras making an announcement. I would have personally prefered PL stayed neutral on the matter.
  5. SollyTeam

    You can blame me for anything you dislike about it, but I stand by it.
  6. FoundationGames

    i cannot 100% say that the chat report feature is bad, because it is not fully implemented
  7. CDAGamingTeam

    Replying toSollyYou can blame me for anything you dislike about it, but I stand by it.

    I wasnt insinuating I disliked it, moreso to say that it shouldnt have involved PL as a whole, since the opinions of mod devs should stay that, shouldnt represent of the whole project
  8. FoundationGames

    1.19.1 didn't release, mojang very clearly knows what they have done
  9. SollyTeam

    Mojang knows what they have done, but I highly doubt mojang thought this was a good idea in the first place
  10. CDAGamingTeam

    Replying toFoundationGames1.19.1 didn't release, mojang very clearly knows what they have done

    this take I also dislike, as Mojang was not the only one behind this. This was msft enforcing the contract they made years ago when they bought mojang, or more so enforcing their policies in a restated manner. But I agree, the drama from it has been getting overblown in several discords thus far
  11. SollyTeam

    Perhaps it is unnecessary, but I don't want to take that risk. Once it's implemented, it would be much harder to get rid of
  12. CDAGamingTeam

    I mean at this point, its going to be implemented one way or another (Since not doing so likely would be breaching msft's orders to mojang), but the way it is going to be implemented is the part the players can vote for change on.
  13. FoundationGames

    Replying toCDAGamingthis take I also dislike, as Mojang was not the only one behind this. This was msft…

    i meant the people who make and manage the game, i don't have enough info to assume that mojang and microsoft are these two separate entities with some power dynamic between them
  14. DayTheMagpie

    My take on it is that thus far, it's proven to be extremely unmoderated and easy to abuse. People are getting unjustified bans, and they're not being properly reviewed by a human being. Servers like 2b2t are going to become ghost towns because of reporting abuse, and the kinds of people who went around hacking into smaller servers (one of mine was affected) are going to abuse the system as well.
  15. CDAGamingTeam

    Replying toDayTheMagpieIt is not ready. Don't implement the damn thing until it's fully ready, and until you…

    Yea, that "the games gonna be dead if they do <x>" also doesnt resonate. MSFT's done tons of shitty acts throughout the years and if anything, has only become more powerful. The vast majority of mc's audience are children who do not know any better and wouldnt care about the system one way or another. "fully ready" in the programming world also does not fundamentally exist. There will always be ways to abuse it, there will always be bugs. anything and every single piece of software you have ever used has never been "fully ready" because quite simply, its not the way our world works.
  16. AzzyypaarasTeam

    I feel the need to note, on the topic of audience
  17. DayTheMagpie

    Fair enough, but they could still do a lot better than whatever the hell this is. At the very least, don't make it a global ban. Making it easier for kids who don't really know how whitelists work to ban people they don't want in their servers is definitely a good thing, but making it apply to all online play is just beyond stupid. That should ONLY apply if you report someone for something horrible, like grooming or doxxing.
  18. CDAGamingTeam

    Replying toDayTheMagpieFair enough, but they could still do a lot better than whatever the hell this is. At the…

    I mean at this stage to all online play actually makes sense, since technically, this is bound to MSFT's services now ever since we migrated our accounts. MSFT accounts == we abide by MSFT's eula now, not mojangs. The reasons for reporting are almost the exact same that would get you perm banned of xbox live (And dont get me started on how difficult it is to appeal if you got as far as a perm ban) Should it be per-server, sure, but in my eyes, whether it be per-server or global should be determined by the chat context. If it went into illegal shit, sure perm-ban them as they dont deserve to stay nor should those type of ppl be in the game, even if it were in a joking manner. If it was something minor, like swearing, and wasn't overly offensive to the majority (Racisim, etc), then sure hit them with a temp-ban or per-server perm ban(edited)
  19. AzzyypaarasTeam

    ehhhhhhhh
  20. Emma

    i don
  21. AzzyypaarasTeam

    You are better than this CDA, there are no compromises to be made
  22. Emma

    i don't understand what you gain by spreading false information. you can't be banned for swearing
  23. CDAGamingTeam

    Replying toEmmai don't understand what you gain by spreading false information. you can't be banned for…

    this was a valid reasoning in an earlier snapshot, but yes it is no longer valid in the current RC
  24. Emma

    people still seem to be claiming you can be banned for stuff like using caps or swearing
  25. DayTheMagpie

    Absolutely it should have context taken into account. Problem is that thus far, it doesn't seem to be based on user experience so far. But yk what, maybe they'll implement a more nuanced and moderated system. Maybe. As for abiding my MSFT's eula, the problem is that most players didn't even want to. I know for a fact most of the people I play with waited until they were forced to to migrate their accounts, and it's shitty that Microsoft enforced that. Sure, it's their game now and they can do that if they like, but players were given no choice but to agree to it.
  26. Emma

    Context is taken into account. The latest release candidate even increased the amount of context automatically sent.
  27. Emma

    https://twitter.com/Shady_Inktail/status/1541163067576406019 there's just a ton of fearmongering going on, for example this

    Shady #BLM #NoNFTs (@Shady_Inktail)

    @MinecraftMeme16 We really do live in times where sending "h" in chat can get you banned on all platforms and from your own single player worlds so that you'd need to buy another account to keep playing. How absurd.
  28. AzzyypaarasTeam

    Lets not forget we are dealing with a corporation
  29. Emma

    Replying toAzzyypaarasContext is in theory taken into account

    everything is in theory because it has not been implemented yet
  30. CDAGamingTeam

    Replying toEmmaContext is taken into account. The latest release candidate even increased the amount of…

    The main concern for it atm is most people think a perm-ban is going to be the only possible punishment. More then likely, this is going to be iterative, with other punishments added as the experience unfolds
  31. Emma

    ok
  32. CDAGamingTeam

    And more then likely, this much fearing has only sped up the timeline towards that
  33. Emma

    NJGrissom (@NJGrissom_)

    1/2 No one in the community asked for the Minecraft Ban nonsense. It's a gross overreach on Mojang's and Microsoft's part. The fact you can get perma banned from multiplayer from censored swears and using all caps is ridiculous. I hope Mojang sees the backlash and thinks twice.
  34. CDAGamingTeam

    yea all caps is a dead-on lie xD
  35. Emma

    Replying toAzzyypaarasMmmm, we need more

    i can pull up more examples if you want but i feel like this proves my point
  36. DayTheMagpie

    Dude, you know that was literally on Mojang's website, right? They were the ones to say that all caps writing was a reportable offense. Sure, it's a stretch to say you'll be permanently banned for it no question, but it doesn't change the fact that Mojang said "this is an offense worthy of reporting".
  37. AzzyypaarasTeam

    I meant more fearmongering :hehe:
  38. Emma

    Replying toDayTheMagpieDude, you know that was literally on Mojang's website, right? They were the ones to say…

    No, it was in the community guidelines that "all caps can be seen as yelling", not "all caps is an offense worthy of reporting"
  39. DayTheMagpie

    And the community guidelines are what people use as a reference for what to report.
  40. Emma

    Home

    Player Chat Reporting in Minecraft: Java Edition
    Our games bring millions of players together, from all over the world, all united by the goal of crafting, exploring, and having fun. That’s why it’s so important that our games are a safe and welc...
  41. DayTheMagpie

    A kid is gonna see that, go "OOOOO YOU BROKE THE MOJANG RULES" and file a report. Look me dead in the eyes and say a fifth grader wouldn't pull that shit.
  42. Emma

    Chat Report Categories 
    Imminent harm - Self-harm or suicide. 
    Someone is threatening to harm themselves in real life or talking about harming themselves in real life. 
    Child sexual exploitation or abuse. 
    Someone is talking about or otherwise promoting indecent behavior involving children. 
    Terrorism or violent extremism. 
    Someone is talking about, promoting, or threatening with acts of terrorism or violent extremism for political, religious, ideological, or other reasons. 
    Hate speech. 
    Someone is attacking you or another player based on characteristics of their identity, like religion, race, or sexuality. 
    Imminent harm - Threat to harm others. 
    Someone is threatening to harm you or someone else in real life. 
    Non-consensual intimate imagery. 
    Someone is talking about, sharing, or otherwise promoting private and intimate images. 
    Harassment or bullying. 
    Someone is shaming, attacking, or bullying you or someone else. This includes when someone is repeatedly trying to contact you or someone else without consent or posting private personal information about you or someone else without consent (“doxing”). 
    Defamation, impersonation, false information .
    Someone is damaging someone else's reputation, pretending to be someone they're not, or sharing false information with the aim to exploit or mislead others. 
    Drugs or alcohol. 
    Someone is encouraging others to partake in illegal drug related activities or encouraging underage drinking. 
  43. DayTheMagpie

    Replying toEmmait has since been updated

    I know, but the fact it was ever there is ridiculous.
  44. Emma

    ok, but you're acting like it's still there(edited)
  45. DayTheMagpie

    And that would also be horrible, because those would be kids just doing kid things and facing way too strong of consequences as a result.
  46. Emma

    It would be clear that talking in all caps does not fall under any of the existing categories
  47. AzzyypaarasTeam

    Imminent harm - Self-harm or suicide. Someone is threatening to harm themselves in real life or talking about harming themselves in real life.
    This, in particular, does still quite worry me
  48. Emma

    that's the main issue
  49. AzzyypaarasTeam

    What exactly do they plan to do in such a case?
  50. Emma

    yeah, just banning the account isn't effective
  51. DayTheMagpie

    Even if you take away how adult players will use the system, child players are also being met with a flawed system that is difficult to understand and easy to use incorrectly.
  52. CDAGamingTeam

    Replying toAzzyypaarasWhat exactly do they plan to do in such a case?

    Probably perm-ban and authority reporting in severe cases
  53. AzzyypaarasTeam

    Replying toCDAGamingProbably perm-ban and authority reporting in severe cases

    Yeahhh, that is a paultry course of action
  54. DayTheMagpie

    Yeah, because taking away a suicidal person's coping mechanism is a great idea.
  55. CDAGamingTeam

    I mean the alternative is not reporting it, then seeing on the news both mojang and MSFT being sued if the parent desicdes to sue bc "Oh, they never did anything"
  56. DayTheMagpie

    Honestly as flawed as it is, I think going the "Reddit Cares" route might be better.
  57. Pipedream

    yeah I'm just gonna go install that mod that disables the client from associating your messages with a key
  58. Evelyn

    Do the ban reports share context btw?
  59. Hisami

    they provide some context
  60. Evelyn

    because if they don't stuff like kill yourself could mean anything and is most likely to be a target to respawn or do /kill
  61. Hisami

    but not whole chat
  62. Evelyn

    Oh ok. I mean the hope is that at least these reports get checked by something other than an AI
  63. Hisami

    yeah
  64. Evelyn

    Have they spoken about how long the report data is kept as well? I imagine it's forever really which is concerning
  65. Hisami

    lmao
  66. Evelyn

    Same with sending chat reports
  67. kalucky0Team

    GDPR my beloved
  68. Hisami

    yes
  69. CDAGamingTeam

    Replying toEvelynAlso i hate the fact that Mojang can now tie those kind of messages to you, it can be an…

    I mean the same argument can be placed on any messenging service? We all have private servers in discord, yet there is proof that our messages get cached on discord's end for quite a while